21. Ott MA mais aussi al., New exchange-of ranging from hormones contraceptives and you can condoms certainly adolescents, Point of views on the Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(1):6–14.
twenty-two. Wilson EK and you will Koo Hp, Associations ranging from lowest-earnings ladies’ relationships attributes in addition to their contraceptive use, Point of views with the Sexual and you can Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Household members and you can pal intimacy so you’re able to teenage sexual lovers in link to condom explore, Log out-of Teenage Wellness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA mais aussi al., The newest developmental association out of relationship high quality, hormone birth control selection and condom non-fool around with certainly teenage women, Journal away from Teenage Health, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you will Sherblom J, Relational commitment and you will risks to help you relationship repair requirements: influences toward condom play with, Log off Western College or university Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty-seven. Manning WD mais aussi al., More youthful mature dating relationships and also the handling of sexual exposure, People Browse and you may Rules Opinion, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty eight. Manlove J ainsi que al., Teenager parents when you look at the promote care and attention: chance facts and outcomes for youth and their college students, Research Temporary, Arizona, DC: Child Styles, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual exposure practices with the having more mature sex lovers: an examination of black colored adolescent lady, Sexually Sent Infection 2002, 29(1):20–24.
32. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom fool around with given that a purpose of time in this new and you may centered teenage sexual matchmaking, American Record off Social Health, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Chance and you will protective affairs of the change in order to a first sexual reference to an older lover, Log regarding Adolescent Wellness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Contraceptive fool around with habits across the teens’ sexual relationships, paper exhibited at the annual meeting of Society Association regarding The usa, Philadelphia, .
thirty-five. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and you will Longmore MA, Linking: the relationship contexts off “nonrelationship” sex, Log of Adolescent Research, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and you will Furstenberg FF, Jr, The effects regarding multiple-hitched virility to own adult info and you can relationship, papers presented from the yearly fulfilling of one’s Association to own Personal Rules Study and you can Administration, Washington, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you will Graefe DR, Interested in a pal? The fresh new marital and you can cohabitation records off unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., Away from Wedlock: Factors and you will Effects out of Nonmarital Fertility, Ny: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
40. Kirby D, Emerging Responses 2007: Research Results to your Software to minimize Adolescent Pregnancy and Sexually Carried Diseases, Arizona, DC: National Venture to avoid Teen and you will Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The new impact out of software to improve contraception explore certainly adult feminine: a glance at experimental hot kazakh women and quasi-experimental studies, Views with the Sexual and you will Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove was program city movie director and senior lookup researcher, Kate Welti try lookup scientist, Age Wildsmith is actually older search researcher and you will Megan Barry was browse specialist, all of the in the Child Fashion, Bethesda, MD.
Background
In the 1st data, which used a city-city shot regarding teenagers for the Ohio, Manning and you will colleagues 9 labeled relationship functions on one to index away from positive properties (including intimate notice-revelation, passionate love and you can relationship salience) and another list out of bad functions (such as conflict and you can nonexclusivity). It learned that high score toward both list was indeed of the shorter condom feel. Detailed analyses along with advised one a variety of high self-confident and you may highest bad results is associated with reduced condom texture.
Inside each round, players was basically questioned “Just like the big date from history interviews, could you be within the a matchmaking relationship in which you think of on your own within two?” We considered respondents to settle an internet dating relationship once they responded yes whenever new lover are a recent relationships spouse, as opposed to a partner, cohabiting partner otherwise former companion. Same-sex matchmaking relationship and those the spot where the respondent got previously cohabited to the lover have been omitted. Complete, 4,013 respondents reported a recent matchmaking dating during 2002–2005. Of one’s leftover participants, 553 weren’t regarding the try during the series interesting, 1,876 had been cohabiting or partnered, and 2,542 had no latest matchmaking dating. Participants within take to have been aged 18–twenty-six.
Dating relationship was centered on one or two steps. The original is actually a great 0–ten scale in which participants ranked the right which they and you will their partner could well be to one another from inside the 6 months. A score from zero indicated absolutely no way; a great ten indicated 100% probability. We classified it chances since reasonable (lower than six), medium (6–9) otherwise large (10). With the next way of measuring partnership, we included an adjustable for if the few got discussed matrimony or cohabitation; solutions have been categorized just like the discussed neither, talked about cohabitation otherwise discussed marriage. (Respondents which reported with discussed one another cohabitation and you will relationships have been incorporated from the matrimony class.)
Heterogeneous birth prevention effects within long run dating can also help determine all the way down contraceptive surface when you look at the longer adolescent dating, even with greater probability of previously-the means to access contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Past research has interpreted it looking by positing that couples are able to occasionally go without contraceptive use in more serious relationships; 32, 34 although not, all of our results advise that shorter birth prevention explore are concentrated in the long-emergency room term relationship described as highest argument minimizing commitment.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Fl and you will Pleck JH, The brand new fictional character from young men’s condom play with during the and you will all over relationship, Family relations Believed Views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.